Hybrid Work Tips

Home

Paul Martin and Colin Rooke discuss the aftershocks of COVID for businesses, the Hybrid work model and how management can embrace this as a permanent solution.

Listen to the full episode here, or read the full transcript below.

Paul Martin:

Welcome to Risky Business Commercial Insurance with Butler Byers. This is Paul Martin, your host, and the business commentator on CKOM. And joining me today, Colin Rooke, Commercial Risk Reduction Specialist with Butler Byers. And Colin, I know we’re starting to talk about the next phase of COVID. And so that really caused me to reflect on that and think of what are the aftershocks, if you can put it that way, of COVID for business, and is there insurance implications and all of that sort of stuff.

Now, one of the things that emerged from the whole two years or so that we’ve been in COVID was just the way we handle going to work. I mean, initially we were shutting down offices completely. Then we started to, midway through, open up a little bit, and now we’re just trying to figure out what’s going to be permanent and what was temporary. You have some thoughts on that? I mean, has the insurance industry looked at this and said, “Well, here’s some things you need to know, and these are the implications of work from home versus go back to work and the old traditional way versus the hybrid model versus versus versus.” And what are you guys hearing and what are you seeing? What’s the industry coming back with?

Colin Rooke:

I mean, our risk management team has spent a lot of time on this topic, because you’re right. I mean, initially you were forced to go home. It’s not something that… Organizations didn’t say, “I’m going to pivot and adapt and send people home because that’s the way the future… your hands were tied. And so you had to work through that and there was a lot of scrambling going on and we did several shows on the pros and cons and what policies and procedures need to be in place, and how to properly structure your IT. But now, we’re in this hopefully coming out of some restrictions and there’s a lot more people returning to work.

So there’s an interesting survey that was circulated and 58% of all workers responded saying they wanted a fully remote position. And in fact, only 3% said they want to be fully in person, that replied to the survey. And so that’s not necessarily the best thing for the business, depending on what industry you’re in. And a great compromise would be this hybrid model. There’s some ability to work from home, but there’s also requirements to be at the office. But it only works when done well. And there’s a lot of pitfalls you’ll want to avoid. It’s one thing to say, “Great, fully flexible.” Well, you need to define that. Who does that apply to?

Anyway, so we’ve got about five different things you’ll want to think about so you can avoid making big mistakes in the adoption of the hybrid model and what work will look like into the future.

Paul Martin:

So you’ve identified the five things that management needs to consider before embracing hybrid as a permanent solution?

Colin Rooke:

Yeah. And then the concern is that the hybrid or the work at home model is better for the employee than the employer. Now, it can work for both and that’s why these are important, but the number one risk to management would be inadequate policies. We’re full of policies. I love every time we get it, we work in a new… and I can’t wait to get it out. But it’s really important to make sure you define, in writing, what hybrid work would look like. For example, who is eligible? So now, it’s outlined, it’s not just subjective. Yeah, you can work from home. We need this position in the office. You have a policy that says who is eligible for a hybrid work environment.

And then from there you want to say, and this is really important, how many days is that employee expected to work in person? Big part of any hybrid work environment. And then probably most important, and I feel like I keep saying this but, how many core hours must that employee work? So when you talk about hybrid or work at home, the idea of flexibility. Maybe you’re an early riser or a night owl, and you can get your work done at times that work better for you and your family. But you need to define, again, what core hours must this person or this position… you need to be available for these times. So just having that conversation and getting it in writing, again, back to what’s going to work best for the business.

And on top of that, back to the policies and procedures, what technology is available and also what is required. So available means, what is the employer going to give you, but what do you need to have as an example. So you can’t necessarily log into a zoom meeting if you have inadequate internet. Now, I realize that people have addressed this problem going into the pandemic. But again, this is making sure you have a policy or procedure that says, “X employee needs a connection of a minimum of this in order to qualify for work at home.” Because you’re making sure you’re getting, in writing, what’s going to work for the employer, the business moving forward.

And then also addressing shared workspaces. So we talked about how much time is spent in the office. Maybe you had a traditional office set up and you felt like, well, that space is mine. Well, now you have to get in writing. You are going to be sharing. Maybe every office is flex. Maybe Paul, I’m sharing an office with you, but again, just make sure that you have a plan in writing for those people that qualify for hybrid work.

Paul Martin:

No, it’s interesting because as we’re putting this show together today, the first of the major banks in Toronto is bringing its people back to work. And they’re not there every day, but then they’re not all coming together. I mean, it’s staggered schedule. But as you lay this out, I mean, it just seems so logical that… but no employer’s going to have this policy in their handbook. So do you have a template available that they can look at or at least the questions they should answer and how they should define what hybrids look like?

Colin Rooke:

Yeah, absolutely. And that’s really the point of this conversation to say, “Well, one, what should I be thinking about? And two, working with us on if we can share resources or go over these questions and more, and just make sure that we’re developing together that proper policies and procedures.”

So another pitfall to avoid or something that you’ll want the management or executive team to do is… So if they haven’t, and throughout the pandemic, tradition management has spent more time at the office, try doing your day to day at home for a week or two. And it’s that whole walk a mile in someone else’s shoes, but it’s easier to pick up on things that you might miss as a management group, when you’re able to say, “Well, now I’ve spent two weeks working from home or even trying the hybrid role. What should be in the policy and procedure manual, good or bad that you’re able to pick up on when you’re actually trying it up for yourself. So that’s an important thing to consider before adopting a hybrid workplace.

Paul Martin:

Yeah. You mentioned the quality of internet connections at your home and that kind of stuff. And that raises all sorts of questions about who’s supposed to pay for it. And how much is the employee responsible for. And how much is the employer, if anything. But you’d think a couple of years into it would’ve sorted this out, but even watching the national news now on television sometimes you’ll see a reporter working from home and they freeze up. So, I mean, even the big national organizations who live with this kind of stuff are still being caught behind the curve on it. So it’s not something you can just assume. And I guess what I’m coming away with here, and the thought process you’re leaving me with is, management’s got to manage in all of this. You got to take charge of this stuff or somehow this policy will get away from you and the employees will start to dictate how the office is run.

Colin Rooke:

Yeah. And that’s really it. I mean, again, you could say, Colin, two years into a pandemic, I mean, this is not new stuff, no. But we’ve all been on Zoom meetings where someone’s cut in and out, or can I get my speaker work, or I’ve got to switch to my phone my laptop is on the freeze. And this is about establishing what’s going to work for the business. So yes, you could say you need internet, but that’s not definitive of what sort of bandwidth am I required to have at home. And then you can get into the conversation of, well, who should pay for that. Maybe you have a position where you require more than the minimum. But this is about going to your internet provider and saying, “Okay, what would be the minimum for this type of work, type of connection, where we’re not going to have any interruptions.

And further to that, what if half your workflow force is client facing? And again, they have a poor connection. I mean, it’s irritating. I mean, it really is. And so the point of this is to say, “Yeah, we’ve been doing this, but now take you some time to actually put pen to paper, so to speak, and say, how does the new office run?” And be specific.

And another item to make sure you cover is communication. So it’s really easy to say, “Well, we use email and there’s chats,” but which chats? And what should be an email, what should be a chat? And choose one chat so it’s chat specific, so you don’t run into a situation where there’s 15 different internal chats going on.

Paul Martin:

All right. We’ve got to take a little break, Colin. So we’ll pick this conversation up after this. You’re listening to Risky Business Commercial Insurance with Butler Byers. Paul Martin, your host. And the guest today, Colin Rooke, Commercial Risk Reduction Specialist with Butler Byers. We’ll be back after this.

Welcome back to Risky Business Commercial Insurance with Butler Byers. This is Paul Martin. And joining me is Colin Rooke, Commercial Risk Reduction Specialists with Butler Byers. Colin, we’re reflecting on the aftermath, I guess. So what happened during COVID, then what are the implications of the long lasting things? And one of the things that happened through COVID, I don’t think any of us predicted it, was how much money people spent on housing. They invested in their properties. They put a lot of money into home improvements. Maybe some people bought entirely new houses, but many did a lot of renovations and upgrades and that kind of stuff. And now in hindsight, has that had some impact on probably increased property values which likely means higher insurance premiums too?

Colin Rooke:

Yeah. So home insurance premium is a hot topic across Canada and renewal premiums are on the rise. I mean, there’s no if, ends, or buts. Now, there’s certain factors, geographic location and claims, that are part of this, but the actual rating itself is not on the rise quite at the level that the public would suggest. And so anyone listening would say, “Well, that makes absolutely no sense. My insurance was up 30% this year, and two years ago, I think it was up 30% again.” It’s on the rise and people don’t like paying higher premiums for home insurance. It’s not a popular thing. But a couple things to consider is your own part in this puzzle.

Now, we can all agree that due to climate change, I mean, everyone knows someone that’s had issues with water. Whether it’s heavy rainfall, overland flooding, sewer backup, water is an issue, climate change is an issue. And that’s something to say, “Well, right.” So they’re paying out more, therefore they want to recoup the cost into the pool and therefore I pay. And yes, that’s a part of it. But what gets skipped over? And if you think about the supply chain, and it’s something that we discussed last show, is renovations.

You lock people in their homes for the better part of 18 to 24 months, and there was a lot of home improvement projects going on and a lot of people upgrading. But if you focus on renovations alone, when you add value to your house, when you finish the basement and it wasn’t previously finished, you do the addition you never thought you’d ever get to, you increase your deck size, you add the shed, and you report that, your premiums are going to go up. And it makes sense. Your home’s worth more. It’s going to cost more to insure it. But it really does get missed.

I mean, it’s probably a problem with the industry that it’s not being communicated as well, you’re part in it. But again, you get to that project, you add 50% value and then, of course, you’ve got the housing market increases across Canada, but that’s something that appears like it’s the doing of the insurance company, but really has nothing to do with them at all. It’s everything to do with the client, the customer. And so again, prior to planning these big renovations, or if you’ve already done it, I mean, $50,000 addition or renovation to my house may turn into some premiums.

Paul Martin:

We probably need to write ourselves a note as part of the deal to go ahead when we renovate is, “Memo to self. This will result in an insurance premium increase.” And then put that in your file so that you’re reminding yourself that you’ve done it. And I can’t help but think of premiums going up 30% and I’m responsible for 29 of it because I increased the value of my house. I really can’t point too many fingers, can I?

Colin Rooke:

No. And they do get pointed. But again, it’s almost not all increases are a bad thing. I mean, if your property value is increasing rapidly, and you’re paying a very small, small portion as a result, it’s really not the end of the world. And yes, there has been some good old fashioned rate increases. But it’s less across the board, it’s more area specific. It’s really around high water tables, flood plains, that sort of thing, and, of course, pending claims. But again, the end user, the customer, has a lot more to play in this problem than you think.

And then another just segues into that whole construction market. So for those that have had claims, rebuilds. So back to this legacy renovation project that you didn’t get to, if you’re doing your own work you might say, “Well, I’m going to slowly renovate the basement over the next five years. I’m going to do it as cheaply as possible because I’m relatively handy.” You have a flood in that same basement and suddenly it’s urgent that it gets rebuilt exactly the specs. And insurance companies end up paying a lot more to redo that project than you ever would because now it looks like it’s on someone else’s dime, and so you want it done as quickly as possible. Well, the speed at which you complete your renovation also costs more.

So again, back to your part in that, you’re driving up your own cost of claims by this requirement to get the repairs done as soon as possible. And it’s just something that people don’t think about. What would I have done if I did it myself versus hiring a team, a restoration company, there might be 30 people working on your home, which you’ll get it back in three or four weeks.

Paul Martin:

Well, Colin, always some interesting food for thought. And you mentioned earlier in the program that we’ve had a couple of conversations in previous shows on this. And probably we should mention that we do archive these shows and they’re actually available if somebody really wanted to go back and listen to them. So if you’re interested, just go to the Butler Byers website and you can find previous episodes.

Colin Rooke:

There’s about five years stored and we’re on SoundCloud as well.

Paul Martin:

All right. You’ve been listening to Colin Rooke, Commercial Risk Reduction Specialist with Butler Byers. I’m Paul Martin. This is Risky Business. Thanks for joining us. Talk to you next time.